|
Hmmm ... I wonder is this Dave Holmes guy is the same person as Alex Gentry? Or perhaps David Wisniewski? I know Safer Arizona seems to have everybody on the planet spying on me, so I wouldn't doubt it if Alex Gentry is using an alias to spy on me. Unlike Sergeant David Stephen Wisniewski, Robert W Clark of Tucson and Zachary Ocker who routinely made hate posts against me laced full of obscenities, and lies Alex Gentry only attacked me once. In that attack post Alex Gentry falsely and incorrectly accused the RAD initiative of violating the Libertarian NIFF or NAP policy by allowing people to sell marijuana to people under 21. Alex Gentry was wrong on that because a transaction between two willing people is certainly not an "initiation of force" by either of them. It's just a business deal. When Alex Gentry made that post I suspected that he was just trying to find a polite way to attack RAD and me. And of course justify the phoney baloney Safer Arizona initiative, which barely legalizes marijuana. This is what David Holmes or Dave Holmes said. Dave Holmes Cute strawman, homie... if i owned a home near yours then you are violating NAP by deteriorating the value of my property. You should reall try to not violate NAP, friend ❤ For those of you who don't know what NIFF or NAP mean they are pretty much the same. NIFF or NAP are also the basis for the Libertarian Party platform. NIFF stand for Non-Initiation of Force for fraud. NIFF means you can do anything you want as long as you don't initiate force or fraud against another person. NAP stands for Non-Aggression Principe. For all practical purposes it's the same as NIFF and also means that you can do anything you want as long as you don't initiate force or fraud against another person. Under NIFF and NAP it is wrong for me to whack a person with a 2 by 4 and steal their wallet. That involves initiating force against another person. Under NIFF and NAP it is wrong to sell a person an ounce of lead claiming that it's gold. That involves cheating the person with a fraudulent statement. Under NIFF or NAP, it is OK to smoke marijuana, buy, sell or trade marijuana. Same goes for consensual deal trading sex for money. I.e. prostitution. Or consensual gambling with another persons. None of those acts involves initiating force or fraud, so they are OK. Under NIFF and NAP, it is OK to use force as long as it is used in defense against a person who initiates force or fraud against you. So under NIFF and NAP is is perfectly acceptable to use force against a person who tried to rob you, or defraud you. So if Under NIFF and NAP if somebody tried to whack you with a 2 by 4 and steal your wallet, it would be perfectly acceptable to defend yourself with a weapon.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||